Pages

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

NDI Homepage

Topic Discussion III
Participation in
Democratic Decision-Making:

The Vital Voices of Women, Civil Society and Pluralism

Room 3
(11 of 16 pages)

We are at this forum, and as far as we are concerned, there is a very important issue related to civic education to help women to develop. I would like to put before this forum, these politicians who must assist and help in training women and creating the necessary cadres in civic education. This is not only related to a system, but should be based on an educational and cultural basis and how we can help and assist citizens to face these challenges in a community with many religions and many ethnic groupings. This society which is composed of the multiple ethnic groups and religions must have a special national program which would overcome all the obstacles which divide between one society and the other.

Thank you.

Chair: Would you please repeat your question.

Speaker: This subject is a big one and I will take up the questions that were in the paper. I consider them an organized entrance to take up this extensive subject. I believe that participation is determined by citizens for different motives. The most important of them relates to emerging democracies or for any society. The most important of these is a functional role for the practice of democracy in he life of a society. Thus, among the most important domains for encouraging and promoting this activity is to radicalize the practice of democracy objectively in the lives of people and establishing this role and this impact on the lives of people. And also to establish this functional role for the practice of democracy in the minds and the awareness of people and then to establish channels for organized institutional work that allows this role to be translated in practice. And finally to establish conviction among citizens that they have the ability to make an impact on their lives through democratic participation.

Participation also takes place for other motives, among them motives related to the human orientation to contribute and participate as a social duty and a national duty and to enhance the level of participation in the democratic process to provide continuity and sustainability. This would all require defining the functional role of the practice of democracy.

The next question is what are the foundations by which we create an equilibrium and a balance between the public role and the requirement of a public discipline. I believe this requires that we establish a legal point of reference and a constitutional point of reference for democratic practices and to establish these in the minds of people and in reality and next to establish an institutional structure that would enable the possibility of practicing democratic practices in all these frameworks. This requires that we establish a clear framework of reference for all the rights and interests that society requires for the practice of democracy. And there should be a structure and a mechanism for the practice of democracy that would take into consideration achieving this balance and equilibrium.

As for speaking of establishing particular paradigms, this depends on each case and the consistency and compatibility of each case and the stage through which each experience is going. As for the participation of women, I believe there are two sets of issues. The first has to do with habilitating women to take up this role and the second has to do with the trends of work in order to develop the capacities of women to take up this role. And also we have to address the motives that will encourage women to take up this role. All these can be nurtured in an integrated manner, but I have no time to go into details. But what I want to say is that to manage the process of democratic and social transitions in general should not be regarded as an ideological conflict. Democratic processes have one of their most important functions in managing these transitions in a peaceful and constructive and effective manner that would contain the process of transformation without undermining society or creating or driving society into conflictual stances. We should not consider this confrontation as an ideological one. So if we have our points of reference as we said before, and this is the case in application in the Republic of Yemen and it has helped to entrench the process of building democracy and its mechanisms in Yemen, although we have weaknesses in the cultural background and practice of democracy in Yemen.


[ Introduction ] [ Worldwide Activities ] [ What We Do ]
[ Feedback ] [ Jobs/Links/Archives ] [ NDI Home ]